In Multipolarity, Sunday, Sept 25, 2016

The UN Security Council held urgent talks on Sunday to discuss the surge of military conflict in the city and surrounding areas of Aleppo, Syria as a result of the breakdown of the ceasefire agreement between the U.S. and Russia of one week ago. The session was called by the United States, France and Britain in an effort to pressure Russia and the Syrian government to cease attacking the military forces supported by the United States and its European allies as part of their ‘regime change’ agenda for Syria.

A Security Council free-for-all and related media gang-up against Russia also serves to distract attention from the illegal, bloody attack by U.S. warplanes (as well as planes from Australia and Denmark) against the Syrian army in Deir al-Zour in eastern Syria on September 17 which killed at least 62 Syrian soldiers. See related readings on that further below.–New Cold

* * *

Meeting of UN Security Council in New York on Sept 25, 2016 (Reuters)

Meeting of UN Security Council in New York on Sept 25, 2016 (Reuters)

The Al-Nusra Front in Aleppo keeps receiving tanks and heavy weapons shipped by their Western backers as the U.S. turns a blind eye, Russia’s envoy to the UN, Vitaly Churkin, told a special session of the Security Council on September 25. He said that securing peace “is almost an impossible task now.”

Al-Nusra Front is currently the most powerful group fighting against the government in Aleppo, with 2,000 out of 3,500 militants in the city the group’s members.

“They are armed by tanks, APCs, field artillery, multiple rocket launchers… dozens and dozens of units, including heavy weaponry,” Churkin said.

“Of course, they couldn’t have made this equipment themselves. All of this has been received by them and is still being shipped to them by generous Western backers, with the U.S., presumably, turning a blind eye,” Churkin said.

According to the Russian envoy, the Al-Nusra Front militants use the civilian population of Aleppo as human shields while indiscriminately attacking residential areas in the city controlled by the Syrian government. “Over 200,000 residents of Aleppo are hostages of the Al-Nusra Front and groups allied with it.”

The terrorists are the main reason why attempts to deliver humanitarian aid to Aleppo have failed, contradicting accusations by the U.S., which blames Russia and Damascus, Churkin said.

Moscow’s experience of giving concessions to the Syrian rebels following requests from the U.S. in the hope of it culminating in a ceasefire has not worked, Churkin told the Security Council, adding that Moscow will no longer be following these steps.

He Churkin said that Russia has pressured Damascus on several occasions to meet the demands of its opponents, in the hope that this would lead to a ceasefire. However, this has not had the desired result and has seen constant violations by some rebel groups despite Washington’s promise to keep them under control.

“The American side de facto signed that it was unable to influence the groups it sponsors and to deliver on the deal as it promised. First of all, to separate those groups from terrorists and mark their positions on the ground accordingly,” he said.

He added that the actions of the US-led coalition, which killed 62 Syrian government soldiers in a miscalculated airstrike near Deir ez-Zour on September 17 and exposed them to an offensive by the terrorist group Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) damaged relations with Damascus.

He dismissed criticism of the Syrian army, expressed at the Security Council meeting by the U.S., France and the UK, over the latest offensive in eastern Aleppo.

Churkin also turned away statements made by his U.S. counterpart Samantha Power who said Russia had to prove that it genuinely has intentions of bringing peace to Syria. He said other parties also have to prove they are willing to take steps towards achieving a ceasefire.

“The ceasefire can only be salvaged now on a collective basis. It’s not we that have to prove something to somebody unilaterally. We have to see proof that there is a genuine desire to separate U.S.-allied rebel groups from the Al-Nusra Front, then destroy the Al-Nusra Front and bring the opposition into a political process. Otherwise our suspicions that this was only meant to shield the Al-Nusra Front would only grow stronger.”

The UN Security Council meeting was convened at the request of the U.S., the UK and France to discuss the escalation of violence in Syria, after the expiration of a ceasefire agreement negotiated by Russia and the U.S.

The three countries accused Russia and Syria of causing civilian suffering in Aleppo, but did not mention the role played by armed groups opposing Damascus, which control large portions of the city.

China took a neutral stance at the meeting and called forn the revival of the ceasefire and facilitation of humanitarian aid to Aleppo, without accusing any party for the violence. The Chinese envoy stressed that counter-terrorism effort is an essential part for resolving the Syrian conflict.

The Syrian envoy to the UN spoke to the meeting and said Damascus was determined to take the whole of Aleppo under its control. He dismissed accusations of indiscriminate attacks against civilians and the use of incendiary weapons which the U.S. voiced against the Syrian army.

The UN special envoy for Syria reported to the Council that the conditions in the contested city are deteriorating and that it needs relief as soon as possible.

After the Security Council meeting, Churkin was asked by the press if the Syrian peace talks between Moscow and Washington were “dead” after recent developments. “I don’t think so,” he replied, but added: “The situation is very difficult.”

“We made our position clear. We need a serious process without trickery, without people changing their demands every two days. We had an agreement and the only thing required was fulfilling it without changing stances,” the envoy said.

If Washington “continues acting in the same manner, it will be difficult to have a serious peace process,” he warned.

The U.S. and its allies aren’t paying enough attention to the violations by the Syrian opposition because in that case “we would find that there aren’t really any moderates” among them, former U.S. diplomat Jim Jatras told RT in an interview. “You have groups like al-Zenki that cut the head of a Palestinian kid two weeks ago and has been accused of using chlorine gas; and Ahrar al-Sham, which is another jihadist group that chased the Americans out of northern Syria,” he said.

According to Jatras, Washington is failing to keep its promise to persuade the opposition to abide with the ceasefire because “frankly, I don’t think [the U.S.] has that much influence.”

“It’s part of a problem that the U.S. has had in repeated wars where we have supported Wahhabist terrorist groups,” including in Libya and Afghanistan where previously backed militants eventually turned against the Americans, Jatras said.

One of the key problems that makes the current situation in Syria particularly difficult is the fact that there are actually no moderate opposition groups, as various rebel groups are in fact controlled by several powerful terrorist organizations, Willy van Damme, a Belgian journalist who has closely followed the Syrian crisis, told RT.

“The problem is that Al Qaeda controls the rebels together with some other terrorist groups. As long as it continues, it is useless to talk about the ceasefire, it is useless to talk about a political solution – it will not happen,” van Damme said.

He also added that even “Col. Steve Warren, the spokesman for the U.S. Army fighting Islamic State in Baghdad, said on April 26 that the eastern part of Aleppo is controlled by Al Qaeda.” At the same time, van Damme stressed that “Western governments and western media do not pay any attention in reality to what the so called rebels… do.”

Related readings:

How the Pentagon sank the U.S.-Russia deal in Syria – and the ceasefire, by Gareth Porter, Middle East Eye, Sept 25, 2016.

Another Kerry rush to judgment on Syria, by Robert Parry, Consortium News, Sept 24, 2016


EDITOR’S NOTE: We remind our readers that publication of articles on our site does not mean that we agree with what is written. Our policy is to publish anything which we consider of interest, so as to assist our readers in forming their opinions. Sometimes we even publish articles with which we totally disagree, since we believe it is important for our readers to be informed on as wide a spectrum of views as possible.

Recent Posts
Contact Us

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Start typing and press Enter to search

Translate »