[Trump and head of NATO had soothing words for Russia days after missile attack against Russia’s ally Syria and as a U.S. naval attack group arrives in Korean waters. It’s not clear who they were trying to fool.]
President Donald Trump has admitted changing his campaign position on NATO, calling the alliance “no longer obsolete”. His desire for good relations with Russia was seconded by NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg, who was in Washington for meetings.
Praising the alliance as the “bulwark of international peace and security” that “defeated communism and liberated the captive nations” of Eastern Europe, Trump said he had changed his mind about NATO after it agreed to do more to fight terrorism.
“We must not be trapped by the tired thinking… but apply new solutions to face new circumstances,” the U.S. president told reporters in Washington on Wednesday, during a joint press conference with Stoltenberg.
“We agreed today that NATO can do more in the fight against international terrorism,” said Stoltenberg, pledging “cash, capabilities and contributions” to the effort.
“Together we represent half of the world’s economic and military power. No other superpower has ever had such a strategic advantage,” added Stoltenberg, the former Norwegian prime minister who has presided over the alliance since October 2014.
Both Trump and Stoltenberg sounded eager for better relations with Russia. U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson is in Moscow, and has met with his counterpart Sergey Lavrov as well as Russian President Vladimir Putin. “Things went pretty well, maybe better than anticipated,” Trump said when asked about Tillerson’s trip, adding that the results should be visible in the long term.
“It would be wonderful if we could get along with Russia. Right now, we’re not getting along with Russia at all,” the president said. “Russia is a strong country. We’ve a very strong country. We’ll see how that works out.”
“Russia’s our neighbor, Russia’s here to stay,” said Stoltenberg, defending NATO’s troop build-up in Eastern Europe. “What we do is proportionate, it is defensive, and we don’t want a new Cold War.”
Addressing media reports about U.S. officials accusing Russia of complicity in last week’s chemical attack [sic] in Syria, Trump allowed for the possibility. “I think it’s certainly possible, I think it’s unlikely,” he said. “I would like to think they didn’t know.”
Any use of chemical weapons is “unacceptable”, Stoltenberg said. He added that the strike on the Syrian airbase was a U.S. operation, not a NATO one, though it was met with understanding by the alliance.
“We strongly support the efforts of a fact-finding commission to establish what happened,” he added.
Trump once again described the world as “a mess” that he inherited from the Obama administration, but projected optimism about a range of problems, from Syria to North Korea.
“By the time I’m finished, it’s going to be a lot better place to live in, because right now it’s nasty,” he told reporters.
On the campaign trail, Trump repeatedly referred to NATO as “obsolete”, and spoke of the need to update the 68-year-old alliance’s “outdated mission and structure.” He also said that the allies should engage more actively in the anti-terror efforts and not force the U.S. to bear the brunt of the campaign.
“We support NATO far more than we should,” Trump said last July, adding that “a lot of countries that aren’t doing what they’re supposed to be doing.” Because of that, candidate Trump said that if he were elected, the U.S. would not be strictly held to its Article V provisions under the NATO charter to militarily defend any allied nation, especially those not paying their fair share.
Trump says NATO not obsolete, reversing campaign stance, Reuters, April 12, 2017
Trump approves Montenegro’s membership in NATO announces White House, Reuters, April 11, 2017
EDITOR’S NOTE: We remind our readers that publication of articles on our site does not mean that we agree with what is written. Our policy is to publish anything which we consider of interest, so as to assist our readers in forming their opinions. Sometimes we even publish articles with which we totally disagree, since we believe it is important for our readers to be informed on as wide a spectrum of views as possible.