In Canada, China

John McCallum, Canadian ambassador to China, arrives for a cabinet meeting in Sherbrooke, Quebec, on January 16. Photo: AP

Ambassador John McCallum depicted the US case against Meng Wanzhou as seriously flawed and said it would ‘not be a happy outcome’ if she were extradited… The remarks were decried as inappropriate political meddling in the case against Meng

Published on South China Morning Post, Jan 24, 2019

Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou, who was arrested last month in Canada, has a “strong case” against extradition to the United States, Canada’s ambassador to China said in extraordinary comments broadcast on Wednesday.

She has been released on bail, but her arrest has sparked an escalating diplomatic crisis between Ottawa and Beijing.

Speaking to Chinese-language media in Markham, Ontario on Tuesday – after briefing lawmakers on the plight of two Canadians detained in China and a third placed on death row in what are widely seen as retaliatory moves by Beijing – Ambassador McCallum depicted the US extradition request as seriously flawed.

“I think Ms Meng has quite a strong case,” he told the news conference, before appearing to offer legal opinion on the case.

“One, political involvement by comments from [US President] Donald Trump in her case. Two, there’s an extraterritorial aspect to her case, and three, there’s the issue of Iran sanctions which are involved in her case, and Canada does not sign on to these Iran sanctions. So I think she has some strong arguments that she can make before a judge,” he said.

“And then the judge will decide whether he or she thinks [Meng] should be extradited or not.”

Trump last month mused in an interview with Reuters about intervening in Meng’s case if it would help him strike a trade deal with China.

Meng’s extradition hearing is expected to start in February. The process could take months or years.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, asked about McCallum’s remarks on Wednesday, stuck to the government’s position of non-interference in judicial matters.

“We will make sure that the rule of law is properly and fully followed,” he said. “That, or course, includes the opportunity for [Meng] to mount a strong defence.”

But if Meng is extradited to the US, McCallum said: “That would not be a happy outcome.”

“And that would take years before it happens because she would have the right to appeal all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada.”

McCallum also said the US could make a deal with China in which it would no longer seek her extradition.

The opposition Tories accused McCallum of possible “political interference” in the case and of discrediting the extradition process.

It’s a setback and an unfortunate setback. It undermines that Canada is playing this by the book
David Mulroney, Canada’s former ambassador to China

David Mulroney, Canada’s former ambassador to China, called McCallum’s remarks “mind-boggling.”

Mulroney said giving advice to a judge is completely inappropriate when the government has been saying that Meng’s extradition is up to judicial authorities.

Mulroney said Trudeau and Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland should distance themselves from the remarks of McCallum, who is a former cabinet minister in the government.

“It’s a setback and an unfortunate setback. It undermines that Canada is playing this by the book,” he said. “If it is a strategy it is a remarkably poor one.”

Trudeau and Freeland have stressed they can’t interfere politically in the case.

Freeland spokesman Adam Austen said in a statement there has been no political involvement in the Meng case and said Canada is honouring its extradition treaty with the United States.

But opposition Conservative lawmaker Erin O’Toole said McCallum’s comments on Meng’s legal matters raises questions of political interference.


EDITOR’S NOTE: We remind our readers that publication of articles on our site does not mean that we agree with what is written. Our policy is to publish anything which we consider of interest, so as to assist our readers in forming their opinions. Sometimes we even publish articles with which we totally disagree, since we believe it is important for our readers to be informed on as wide a spectrum of views as possible.

Recent Posts
Contact Us

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Start typing and press Enter to search

Translate »