A candidate supported by Russia is likely to win the vote for a new governor in Gagauzia, an autonomous region in Moldova. The Moldovan government and the EU fear that Gagauzia’s separatist ambitions are on the rise.
For Gagauzia, Europe is a distant and unappealing concept. This was evident in a referendum carried out early last year: 98 percent of the population was in favor of strengthening ties with Russia.
Read further below: Moldova’s Gagauz elect pro-Russia governor, Radio Free Europe, March 23, 2015
A recent survey showed that only 2 percent of Gagauzians were happy about the EU association agreement signed by Moldova – an overwhelming majority supported the idea of a customs union with Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan. Gagauzia has 160,000 residents, the majority of them Gagauzians – a Turkic, Orthodox Christian people.
In contrast to Transnistria, which broke away from Moldova in 1992 after a bloody civil war, Gagauzia has remained an autonomous region within Moldova. But along with the unfolding crisis in Ukraine, stronger separatist tendencies have developed. And it is no secret that Russia is involving itself in local affairs to weaken the influence of the Moldovan government. One example of this is the exception made for Gagauzia in the embargo on Moldovan wine and agricultural products – a ban imposed by Russia in response to Moldova’s EU association agreement.
Gagauzia’s strong pro-Russia stance can also be seen in the local media landscape: it nearly exclusively consists of Russian news sources, which deliberately misinform their audience about European integration. They present an extremely negative picture of the European Union and stir up fears about alleged colonization by the EU.
Pro-Russian candidate set for victory
Surveys show that in Sunday’s gubernatorial election in Gagauzia, a pro-Russian candidate, Irina Vlah, had the best chances of success. Out of those polled, 60 percent had said they would vote for her in the first election round.
The socialist politician not only received support from her party, but also from Russia. Russian delegates traveled to Gagauzia’s capital, Comrat, on several occasions to get involved in the election campaign. Moldova’s pro-European government sees this as blatant interference in the country’s domestic affairs and fears an increase in separatist ambitions.
For Moldovan journalist Nicolae Negru, Russia’s involvement in the Gagauzian election is a clear provocation. In an interview with DW he said Moscow was attempting to pitch Gagauzia against the Moldovan government. The goal of this is to “weaken Moldova’s European perspective.”
Moscow shows interest in Gagauzia
Current developments in the region seem to confirm his theory. The annexation of Crimea last year and the war in Ukraine, Russia’s strategic partnership with the separatist regions in Georgia – Abkhazia and South Ossetia – and the recent presence of Russian troops in Transnistria are all major obstacles to cooperation between the EU and Georgia, Ukraine and Moldova.
Moldovan political scientist Corneliu Ciurea sees Moscow’s efforts as an attempt to promote separatism in the region. However, he also places some of the blame on the Moldovan government: the never-ending rivalry between the so-called pro-European parties and their lack of interest in Gagauzia has destroyed the trust of the Gagauzian people. He warns that Gagauzia could give up its loyal form of autonomy in favor of a solid anti-European stance.
Recent statements by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov have not helped ease tensions. On Russian television, Lavrov said that because of Moldova’s EU association agreement, Russia needed to do more to serve the interests of certain areas in the region, especially Gagauzia.
Germany fears destabilization
In Germany, the Gagauzian election was followed great interest. In a statement for DW, chairman of Germany’s Commission for European Union matters, Gunther Kirshbaum, said that “Russian interference is plain to see and one can only warn Moscow to not continue its destabilizing course in Europe following the developments in Ukraine.”
He pointed out that, just like Ukraine, Moldova was a sovereign state and “everything that undermines this sovereignty is a clear breach of international law.”
According to the Bundestag’s Moldova and Ukraine expert Bernd Fabritius, Irina Vlah’s electoral victory could lead to a radicalization of the demands made by Gagauzia, such as for more independence.
“Since the socialist party is financed directly by Moscow, an annexation scenario in this case is a very real possibility,” Fabritius told DW.
However, Manfred Grund, chairman of the German-Moldovan Forum, sees “no clear signs that the situation is leading to a split-off like Transnistria’s.” Instead, he said Moscow’s aims were more about exerting pressure on the Moldovan government and destabilizing the country.
* * *
Moldova’s Gagauz elect pro-Russia governor
Voters in Moldova’s autonomous territory of Gagauzia have voted in a new governor in a region where support for closer ties to Russia is strong.
Gagauzia’s Central Election Commission (CEC) declared Moldovan parliamentarian Irina Vlach the winner, with 51 percent of the vote. Nikolai Dudoglo, the former mayor of the Gagauz capital, Comrat, received 19 percent of the vote.
The CEC said more than 63,000 out of Gagauzia’s 105,000 registered voters took part in the election.
Vlach has called for closer ties to Russia.
Gagauzia — which is populated mainly by ethnic Turk Christians — enjoys economic autonomy but has Moldovan police, schools, and courts. Last year, Gagauzia held a referendum in which voters overwhelmingly chose closer ties with Russia and opposition to EU integration.
Moldovan officials banned a Russian television crew sent to cover Gagauzia’s election last week.
Based on reporting by AP, TASS, and Interfax
EDITOR’S NOTE: We remind our readers that publication of articles on our site does not mean that we agree with what is written. Our policy is to publish anything which we consider of interest, so as to assist our readers in forming their opinions. Sometimes we even publish articles with which we totally disagree, since we believe it is important for our readers to be informed on as wide a spectrum of views as possible.