On Monday the European Union announced the prolonging of economic sanctions against Russia for another six months. The announcement was made on the website of the European Council (aka Council of the European Union), the executive body of the EU.
The extension of sanctions was agreed upon by EU members in Brussels on Friday. There were no objections raised.
EU sanctions against Russia were initially introduced last July for one year over the crisis in Ukraine and the reunification with Crimea. They included restrictions on lending to major Russian state-owned banks, as well as defense and oil companies. In addition, Brussels imposed restrictions on the supply of weapons and military equipment to Russia as well as military technology, dual-use technologies, hi-tech equipment and technology for oil production.
Russia responded by imposing an embargo on agricultural produce, food and raw materials against countries that joined anti-Russian sanctions. Imports of beef, pork, poultry meat, fish, cheese, milk, vegetables and fruit have been banned. Moscow also launched a policy of import substitution.
Sanctions have been further prolonged by both sides with the EU reducing the year long period to just six months.
Lately, some European policymakers have started pointing out that sanctions have proven to be politically ineffective and economically harmful for both Russia and European countries. Business communities in Germany, Italy, Greece and other countries of the European Union have publicly protested against the continuation of sanctions against Russia. European businesses claim they have become “hostages of the anti-Russia sanctions’ policy.”
German business protests EU sanctions against Russia, German Economic News, Dec 17, 2015, translated to English on Russia Insider
The Committee on Eastern European Economic Relations has used unusually strong wording to protest against the EU’s extension of sanctions against Russia. The Committee praises Russia and and at the same time, puts an end to the fairytail that trade with Ukraine could compensate for the losses incurred with Russia.
EDITOR’S NOTE: We remind our readers that publication of articles on our site does not mean that we agree with what is written. Our policy is to publish anything which we consider of interest, so as to assist our readers in forming their opinions. Sometimes we even publish articles with which we totally disagree, since we believe it is important for our readers to be informed on as wide a spectrum of views as possible.