By Alexander Mercouris, columnist, Sputnik News, Nov 12, 2015
This week, the Western media has been filled with lurid stories about the Russian athletics doping scandal. A lengthy report has found evidence not only of cheating on the part of some Russian athletes and sports officials — something denied by no one — but has gone much further and is claiming that the cheating is systematic.
One of the authors of the report has gone further still and is accusing not just Russian sports officials of involvement in the scandal but is claiming that the cheating was carried out with the knowledge of senior officials of the Russian government.
On the strength of these claims, there is now a demand that Russian track and field athletes should be banned from participating in next year’s Summer Olympics in Rio.
I am not in a position to comment on the details of these allegations. Some of the allegations are supported by confessions by some of those involved, whilst the evidence to support others looks compelling if not always conclusive. Others — including some of the most incendiary — are for the moment simply allegations.
In a number of cases, such as the claim Russian officials were operating a supposedly secret laboratory alongside the disclosed one, I frankly don’t understand the allegation or the presumed motive — possibly because sports medicine is not something I know anything about.
In a few cases, it seems to me there is simply misunderstanding. One example involves the role of the FSB. The authors of the report do not seem to understand the role of the FSB as a law enforcement agency. Given the terrorist threats routinely made against Russian athletes, and the terrorist threats made against the Winter Olympics in Sochi, the presence of the FSB is natural rather than suspicious. I doubt the authors of the report would find the presence of the FBI suspicious in a like situation in the U.S., or would find a police presence suspicious in like circumstances in any other Western country.
One particular claim — the one that the Russian sports minister supposedly knew of the scandal and is therefore complicit in it — is based entirely on inference.
Having said this, it is not my intention to deny the existence of a serious problem. Doing so would be ridiculous given that the Russian authorities admit there is one.
However, there is one point I must make. This is that to impose a blanket ban on all Russian track and field athletes so as to prevent them participating in the Summer Olympics in Rio seems to me discriminatory and wrong.
Firstly, it goes against the presumption of innocence by assuming individual athletes are guilty of cheating without proof and before the cheating has taken place.
Secondly, it violates what I had always understood to be one of the guiding principles of the Olympic Movement — that the important thing is not to win but to take part. It seems grossly unfair — and hardly consistent with this principle — to prevent innocent athletes competing by lumping them together with guilty ones.
Lastly and most importantly, it seems to me utterly wrong to ban athletes from competing simply because they are Russian. That goes utterly against the humanitarian principles upon which the Olympics were founded. It is also contrary to the non-discriminatory principles in most national laws.
The Russian authorities are challenging some of the allegations — as it is their right to do — but look to be genuinely offering cooperation to help solve the problem. For example, they have offered to appoint a foreign specialist to head their laboratory. The right thing to do is not to impose a blanket ban but to work with the Russian authorities so that the problem can be solved. That may involve bringing criminal charges and imposing individual bans on specific persons, barring them from involvement in international sports training and competition.
If that does not happen and a blanket ban on Russian athletes is imposed instead, then it seems to me that the world’s sporting bodies will not only have retreated from their ideals but will open themselves up to questions about what their real motives are.
EDITOR’S NOTE: We remind our readers that publication of articles on our site does not mean that we agree with what is written. Our policy is to publish anything which we consider of interest, so as to assist our readers in forming their opinions. Sometimes we even publish articles with which we totally disagree, since we believe it is important for our readers to be informed on as wide a spectrum of views as possible.