“The congress has set a task to seek recognition of results of the referendum held in 1991,” Ruthenians’ leader Pyotr Getsko said.
Ruthenians of the Trans Carpathian region in Ukraine (Zakarpattia Oblast) are demanding to recognise them as a separate nationality and to be granted a status of autonomy through a dialogue with Kiev, Ruthenians’ leader Pyotr Getsko told TASS on Saturday.
“There has been an event and the decision has been made,” Getsko said. “The congress decisions have set a task – to demand recognition of the Ruthenians as a separate nationality and to demand through a dialogue that results of the referendum on an autonomy status held in 1991 be implemented. It has not been before but now the direction is towards dialogue and not confrontation.”
“The congress has set a task to seek recognition of results of the referendum held in 1991,” Getsko said.
A congress of Ruthenian organisations in Transcarpathia approved on Saturday a decision to demand from the Ukrainian authorities the recognition of the Ruthenian nationality along with Subcarpathian Rus’ autonomy through a dialogue with Kiev.
“The most significant goal of the Coordination Council is to open and intensify the dialogue with Kiev governmental agencies in order to take a decision on possible recognition of the results of referendum held in Transcarpathia in 1991 when 80% of the population actually voted in favour of granting the region a status of autonomy,” says the statement adopted at the congress.
The Ruthenians are East Slavic people, with the population from 1.5 to four million, out of whom the major part reside in Ukraine’s Trans Carpathian region. The name is a Latinized form of the word Russian and the term Little Russians may be also applied to them.
Carpathian Ruthenia (Subcarpathian Rus) was registered as an object of international law in the Treaty of Saint-Germain-en-Laye in 1919.
After the World War II, in 1945, it was abolished and absorbed by Ukraine, then part of the Soviet Union.
In the past 20 years after the collapse of the Soviet Union the Ruthenians have been seeking from the Ukrainian government to grant them a status of autonomy and to recognise them as a separate nationality.
Interview with Pyotr Getsko on the Feb. 2015 ceasefire in Ukraine: ‘The war in Ukraine will continue in Europe’, in Pravda.ru, Feb. 25, 2015
Transcarpathian Rusin leader Pyotr Getsko ‘does not exclude’ using force against Kyiv’, by Paul Goble, published in Eurasia Daily Monitor, Volume 11, Issue 109, June 17, 2014, reprinted on Jamestown Foundation website
And from 2009:
Right-wing Svoboda ‘sabotages’ Ruthenian Congress in Uzhgorod
The right-wing Svoboda Party says it has blocked the holding of the third European congress of the Carpathian Ruthenians in Uzhgorod on Friday. According to Svoboda’s press service, the Carpathian Ruthenians planned to hold their congress in Zakarpattia Regional Puppet Theater on May 1.
“Representatives of Svoboda blocked the puppet theater entrances and the tribune to prevent the so-called congress, anti-Ukrainian tendencies and adoption of pseudo-declarations of independence. The representatives of Svoboda blocked a great number of separatists and communists, who supported the Ruthenians. Only 31 delegates managed to register,” the press service stated.
As reported, the second European congress of the Carpathian Ruthenians was held in Mukacheve on October 26, 2008, at which a decision on setting up a Ruthenian state was taken. A criminal case on separatism was opened against the leader of the Ruthenian national movement, Dmytro Sydor.
The charges against Sydor include appeals for changes to be made to Ukrainian territory and the state border as defined by the national constitution. He has since been released on his own recognizance.
EDITOR’S NOTE: We remind our readers that publication of articles on our site does not mean that we agree with what is written. Our policy is to publish anything which we consider of interest, so as to assist our readers in forming their opinions. Sometimes we even publish articles with which we totally disagree, since we believe it is important for our readers to be informed on as wide a spectrum of views as possible.